Join "Health on the Horizon" on Facebook!
Mitt Romney on the campaign trail during the Republican Primary |
The term “Silly Season” has been popping into my mind a lot
lately. “Silly Season” is typically described as the
time in late summer into early fall of an election year where candidates engage
in political posturing for media attention.
This will usually results in ridiculous claims. My question then is, has the “silly season”
already begun?
While I have come to expect our politicians to flat out lie
for political pandering, what has come to disturb me most is the statement
concerning a commitment to repeal the bill and the political weight the
argument is carrying. I often wonder if
those that support the rally cry have stepped back and asked themselves exactly
what this would mean. As I have explored
this issue around the state of Pennsylvania, I have often become frozen in
dismay regarding the lack of information and belief in misinformation many
people possess. They know little about
the details that lie behind the political rhetoric. Sadly, our politicians take advantage of this
ignorance.
Therefore, I challenge those that support Mr. Romney’s rally
cry to repeal the healthcare law by asking them to consider some of the following
hypothetical situations:
·
Should we now tell 2.5 million young adults (and
their parents), like Eric, that they are no longer able to access
affordable care? As of January 2011, the
PPACA has allowed young adults under the age of 26 to stay on their parent’s health
insurance until they obtain a policy of their own.
·
Should we tell small business owners like Susan, and Laura/Michael that
they will no longer have access to small business tax credits and the small businessexchange (marketplace) in order to purchase affordable healthcare? Do they have to instead continue spending
over 30% of their take home pay on health insurance?
·
Do we now have to tell every single insured
American that health insurance companies can continue the same consumer abuses
they have done for decades? In other
words, are you going to explain to the American people that when the Medical Loss Ratio
is repealed, insurance companies can spend unrestrained amounts of patient
premium dollars on advertising, CEO bonuses and lobbying instead of on their
health care?
·
Do you also intend to tell every single American
that health insurance companies can continue arbitrarily raising your premium
rates year to year because you support repealing rate review?
·
Are you going to explain to Gary that
when his company laid him off and moved to Venezuela or Brianna, whose company
refuses to offer her healthcare that they will no longer be able to access
affordable healthcare from the individual exchange (marketplace) ?
·
Finally, try explaining to me that
because I have a pre-existing stroke condition that if I someday change
insurance plans I can be denied coverage, subjecting myself to financial peril.
As the silly season seems to be upon us a bit early this
election season, I leave those that support repeal with one final
statement: Be careful what you wish for….you just might
get it.
No comments:
Post a Comment